Turin King List – Column 9

The trace where the papyrus breaks off following the year is been read as a ditto mark, indicating zero years, with the months lost, and only the number of days remaining. However, it cannot be excluded that the trace after the year sign should be read as a number rather than a ditto mark, yielding x years, 3 months (and 0 days). The figure for number of years could be read as any of 1, 2, 3, 8, 10, 20, 30, or 40.

The pestle sign (U33, ti) was certainly an error by the scribe for the very similar oar-sign (P8, ḫrw). The name Khatira can thus be emended Khakherura (ḫa-ḫrw-rꜤ).

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.

The end of a long row in the previous column (8.3) encroach the start of this line. This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The end trace of a likely 11/21 days is evident just before the one.

As the papyrus cuts off after three vertical strokes, the number of years is either 3 or 4.

The months and days are lost, and fr. 75 (containing numbers) placed by Farina does not belong here, but at the end of column 7 (i.e. 7.10-13).

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The unreadable sign after the year notation seem to indicate a reading of zero years.

Only traces of an unreadable name remain, with a 1-year reign, the number of months and days is lost.

Only a partial name is preserved. This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The lack of space for the number of years before the ditto mark for months indicate zero years.

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The number of years is lost, but the reading of 3 months is likely, as it is placed directly below the previous entry for months (9.10).

The lacuna marks that the number of months was lost. This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The number eight at the end is badly damaged but certain.

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.

The number of years is lost. The lacuna notation at the end suggest that the records for an unknown number of kings were lost in lacuna.

The name is lost, only the number of days remain. The papyrus break off, but it is clear that the number could be in the 21-24 days range.

The dot after the year signs is a clear indication that the years should be read as zero. Only a 1 is preserved for the number of days, but any number from 1-4 could have stood where the papyrus breaks off.

The dot after the year signs is a clear indication that the years should be read as zero. This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations. The year and month numbers are lost, and the days number can be 10 or 20, followed by the sublinear tail of a nine, yielding a probable 19 days, or less likely 29.

This is the only record of this king, there are no other attestations.

Ibscher added a tiny fragment to fr. 101 here that is not present in Lepsius.

The horizontal fibres of fr. 123 corresponds with fr. 101. The upper part of fr. 123 must have been added by Ibscher or Farina, as it is not present in Lepsius. However, Ryholt did not comment on the removal of this small fragment, which I have marked as unplaced fr. 123* for now.

The traces where the fragment break off is likely the beginning of a nomen, but cannot be identified.

The N21-sign (r) tentatively read by Gardiner, can be confidently read as the determinative Y1-sign.

The V30-sign (nb) is likely a mistake for O29 (ꜤꜢ), which would yield the correct name ꜤAnati (ꜤꜢ-nꜤti), and the last sign is the determinative of a seated man (A1), not the walking legs (D54) which are very similar in hieratic.

Restoration

Ryholt 1997: 99f.

The last sign is the determinative of a seated man (A1), not the walking legs (D54) which are very similar in hieratic.

Only traces of the cartouche close remain, the name is lost.

The papyrus is lost.